022 - The True Cost of Car Ownership

022 | The True Cost of Car Ownership

This content may contain affiliate links through which we are compensated when you click on or are approved for offers from our partners. See our disclosures for more info.

Do you know what your car is actually costing you each year? What about over an investing lifetime? In this episode of the ChooseFI Radio Podcast we cover the True Cost of Car Ownership and you’ll be absolutely amazed at the numbers.

1500 days

In Today’s Podcast we cover:

  • ChooseFI: The Ultimate Guide to the True Cost of Car Ownership
  • Your car payment is a terrible way to spend your hard earned money
  • We’ll present two different perspectives: Brad will show the long-term compounded cost of buying/leasing new cars continually versus holding a car for 15 years while Jonathan is going to present the yearly cost of your car
  • Brad wanted to see what it was costing someone to constantly “manage their car payments” at a set number forever by buying/leasing new cars
  • This example is too conservative so a FI person would actually save even more money!
  • In Brad’s example the FI person is buying a new car every 15 years. They have payments for the first 5 years and $0 car payments the final 10 years.  Person B is constantly paying $300 per month.  This is a 45 year study, so Person A bought 3 new cars in the 45 year period
  • At the end of the 45 year period, Person A’s savings compounded to be worth $742,000 versus Person B who was constantly paying $300 per month.
  • Takeaways: Don’t buy new cars and continue to drive your car as long as possible with no car payment!
  • Most people can’t truly afford an expensive car and house even on a large salary. This is a true key to FI
  • Astounding that $300 per month for 30 out of 45 years are ending up with $742,000 while most people don’t have anywhere near that much money after a lifetime of working and “saving.” That also shows how little money most people are saving
  • Jonathan’s bad track record with buying cars in his life

The True Cost of Car Ownership Calculator

  • Jonathan’s example for yearly car cost compared a new car for $30,000, a 5 year old car for $15,000, and a 10 year old car for $5,000
  • Went through yearly depreciation calculation for Jonathan’s three examples
  • Went through a calculation of annual opportunity cost of the year-by-year amount lost at 8% annual return if you would have invested based on these 3 examples
  • Calculation of maintenance, insurance, taxes, inspections, etc.
  • Also calculate the cost of gas each year depending on the type of car
  • The 20 year difference from having a used car versus a new car is almost $250,000
  • Jonathan’s determination is you should buy a ‘gas sipper’ that’s at least 5 or 10 years old

True Cost of Home Ownership

Links from the show:

Click here for the excel sheet download for Jonathan’s car ownership example
Download Now

Books Mentioned in the Show:

16 thoughts on “022 | The True Cost of Car Ownership

  1. This is tangential at best to the podcast discussion, but as an urban planner I have to bring this up – the high cost of free parking. (See book The High Cost of Free Parking by Donald Shoup.) A post of MMM blog a few weeks ago touched on this idea a bit… but free parking & the suburban landscape makes the cost of EVERYTHING else increase. Reducing our reliance on cars would benefit all of us quite a bit. Here’s an NY Times article that summarizes the book well: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/business/economy/15view.html?_r=0

  2. **FI Teacher Nerd Alert**

    I made a compound interest problem out of this episode, and used it in my Algebra class today. Then we discussed the math behind why buying a brand new car is not a smart decision. So many people buy a new car right out of college, but investing the amount of a monthly car payment for 5 years turns into a staggering number when compounded over a 30 year working career (even after you stop after 5 years). That new car is cool now, but is it worth not having $200K later? Thanks for the information guys! Teenagers love the idea of FI, but no one teaches it to them.

  3. Great content! I love the real life, actual-numbers example to help put this all in context. I am absolutely on the same page about minimizing transportation costs where at all possible. I currently live in a more expensive metro area, and not having a car has been a huge money saver.

    Additionally, I would go so far as to say that the annual opportunity cost you presented is on the lower/conservative side. For example, buying the 5-year used car at $15k and investing the $15k difference between that and the new car means I would have $32k at the end of 10 years (after compounding at 8% per year), or about $3.2k per year in “true” opportunity cost – that number is even higher with the 10-year old car ($5.4k in annual opportunity cost by buying the new car).

    Again, loving all the content you both are putting out, and looking forward to all the great content to come. While it may be harder to present with actual numbers, please please continue to do so – it really drives the point across better. Thank you!

  4. Lifestyle creep is a real and dangerous thing, especially when it comes to the vehicles people drive. Its rare that you see someone “move down” in car, and when they do you can tell there has been an ego hit. Johnathan, I totally agree with your statement about being able to own nicer things with a positive TCO when you buy well below market value. I have actually done this with boats for the last 5 years or so with a simple 800# and a website.

      • What I do specifically is very similar to what many of the buyers/wholesalers over at biggerpockets do with homes. I browse craigslist, send out some direct mail, leave flyers at marinas, and put “bandit signs” around at high traffic areas around a a specific lake I like to hang out on…all to drive traffic to a website (boatcashusa.com) or a lead gen phone number (844-boatcash). Typically, I know the exact year, make, and model that I want to buy and I know the ACV (actual cash value) of the boat and I will make offers well below that number. I think this could be easly replicated with popular cars, and I know several guys that do that quite a bit.

        I hope that clears it up. I’ve probably spent a total of $300 in marketing. I’ve purchased 5 total in 5 years and have a positive (profitable) total cost of ownership including storage, maintennce, insurnace, fuel, winterization, etc.

  5. What am I screwing up on insurance for the cars? I just dropped it by 600/year by switching from Allstate to Liberty Mutual. It’s still $1,762/year (147/month). That’s for full coverage on 2 cars – one is 6 years old, the other is 17 years old. The Comprehensive and Collision coverage (with 500 deductibles) is $501/year ($42/month) of that total.

    So – I’m $147/month for full coverage and $105/month for just liability. Your numbers are $100/$50 – so it appears I’m overpaying by 50%. I know I can adjust them in the spreadsheet – but there has to be more than this. I don’t think car insurance in Florida is 50% more than Virginia. Now – I have great coverage – but as I come close to FI, I think I need that insurance – right? I don’t have towing (I have a Chase Sapphire Reserve card thanks to Brad, so that covers that) and no Identity Fraud (get that from work), I do have towing – but that is $56/year total for both cars. I’m almost 50 (wife 4 years younger) with perfect driving records.

    On a different thought – I can find common ground for you guys with driving a nice car (cars) while still being frugal. I have a BMW Z3 and a Lexus CT200h. The BMW is in awesome shape because I take great care of it – it’s almost 18 years old now, and still turns heads for less than a slightly newer Civic. The Lexus CT200h is basically a Prius, it was only a couple hundred more than a similar Prius – same 42MPG, looks better in my estimation and handles better. Also, depreciation is on a slower curve, but pretty much irrelevant for a guy that’s going to drive it into the ground.

    • I’d check the actual rates in FL vs VA instead of making any assumptions on that front.

      But you’ve got it exactly backwards when it comes to “as I come close to FI, I think I need that insurance – right? “. While liability insurance is always legally required, full coverage is entirely optional and LESS necessary as you get closer to FI. Why? Because you’ll have a bucketload of money available that you can use to fix or replace your car in the event of an accident. Insurance is a losing proposition for the customer on average. The only point of getting insurance is either
      1) you have information that the insurance company doesn’t that makes you more like to get payouts than they think (eg you’re actually a terrible driver but they’ve only ever been close calls so your record doesn’t show that)
      2) you can’t weather the low probability high cost events (such as your car getting totaled)

      When you’re FI, you don’t need #2 for your car.

      • Good points all, Fiby!

        When I mentioned that I have “great insurance” – I wasn’t clear. I meant that I have lots of liability insurance – because, as I get closer to FI, I have a higher net worth, and need more coverage so I don’t get cleaned out. Your comments on “low probability, high cost events” did resonate with me.

        I guess my frustration is similar to years ago, before I understood 25X/4% rule. I used to wonder “how much do you need for retirement – what’s the number?” Now I know. I’m looking for a similar epiphany with insurance – “how much insurance do I need if my net worth is X, my cars are worth Y and I’m paying Z. That’s a calculator I could get my head around. Insurance agents are worthless – they are paid to have me have super coverage I’ll never use. Same with Insurance companies and lawyers. I wish there was a “Insurance consultant” with a fiduciary responsibility like we sort of have in financial advisors. Of course, I don’t trust them either 🙂 Thanks!

  6. Hi guys, this great episode inspired me to think about my cost of non-car ownership, I hope you don’t mind!

    I’ve only recently discovered your site/podcast and it’s a new favourite! ‘Sup, fellow tax nerds! 🙂

  7. These figures are really conservative when you figure the average person needs to earn more than $35K in wages before having $30K in gross post-tax dollars to actually buy a $30K car. Yet another reason to avoid this much vehicle expense.

  8. I am wondering if you guys could have a podcast with MMM and have one of the topics be a discussion of whether bicycle usage is a pillar of FI or not. That would be pretty funny to hear. Glad to hear a podcast from guys in Richmond, VA. I am in Maryland and half of my family is from Richmond, VA. Everybody always seems to be from Colorado in this community!

    • So True, East Coast represent 🙂 Haha that would be a funny episode. Brad and I would definitely come out of that podcast with a black eye (face punch)

  9. I’ve always been a little confused at depreciation. I’m not an accountant or anything, but I don’t feel it is too technical, I guess I just disagree with the premise. Especially the idea that this is ‘real’ dollars. The money you paid for the car is real, and it is already gone, how am I losing it again?
    Maybe it is my personal view on vehicles. I don’t really see them as investments, which I know most of y’all don’t either, and I don’t see them as something to resale, because I plan on running them into the ground. In that case, why would I count depreciation? I look a car as something I pay for as a means for travel, something that offers utility.
    Like I said, maybe I just don’t have a good understanding of deprecation. Would love to get more thought from y’all about this.
    Also, if it were possible to test, I bet you could blindfold someone have them test drive a BMW 3 and a Mazda 3, and they probably couldn’t tell you which was which from driving.

    • Thats reasonable- you have to pick one, I didn’t include purchase cost, I included depreciation cost instead (its either/or). I think depreciation cost is more accurate because although you are doing what I would generally recommend ( drive it for 10-20 years into the ground) most people do sell and trade cars every 5 to 10 years and depreciation cost allows us to capture that picture. Math can tell many different stories depending on what lens you use 🙂

Leave a Comment